jump to navigation

Do you still believe Nanking Massacre? August 26, 2010

Posted by TAMAGAWABOAT in Andrzej Wajda, Frank Capra, Japan, Katyn, Nanking Massacre, Rape of Nanking, TIBET, TIBET UPRISING, Yasukuni.
Tags: , , , ,
111 comments

Do you still believe that so-called the Nanking Massacre  (or the Rape of Nanking) actually happened in December 1937?  To be honest, I too had believed ‘the Nanking Massacre’ blindly until just 7 or 8 years ago.

As I remember, when Ishihara Shintaro, the current governor of Tokyo was still a Diet member in the mid-1990s, he commented in an interview with mass media, “I know it is said that the Japanese Army committed the Nanking Massacre.  But the Nanking Massacre is not a historical fact.  This is a hoax by China.  Japan’s image was badly tarnished by this hoax.”  I watched the news on TV.  I remember that I barked at TV in anger then, “What!?  Ishihara Shintaro is also going to deny America’s atomic bombing?  Denying Nanking is tantamount to denying Hiroshima and Nagasaki.”   I suppose that some of the people who believe the Nanking Massacre have the same experience in saying or thinking as I said to TV then.  I thought about what caused such a reaction to denial of the Nanking Massacre.  Why do you think I said that denying the Nanking was tantamount to denying Hiroshima and Nagasaki then?  Why do you think I thought about war crimes in sets with Hiroshima/Nagasaki and Nanking?  Why do you think I got angry at Ishihara’s comment then?

I think this is a kind of conditioned reflex to denial of the Nanking Massacre.  For example, I associated Hiroshima and Nagasaki with Nanking.  In addition, I felt righteous anger toward the person who denies the Nanking Massacre as if I represented justice in the world.  It’s my guess that I was imprinted a kind of conditioned reflex in my subconscious mind somewhere (at school, in movies,  at museums or through mass media).  This is a kind of brainwashing.   Therefore, whenever I attempt to appeal for atrocious and inhuman acts of atomic bombings on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, someone counter-argues that atomic bombings were paid the penalty for the Nanking Massacre.  So to speak, the Nanking Massacre is often used for the purpose of avoiding blame for atomic bombings,  and is used for the purpose of preventing Japan from being the true victim of WW2.

The rise of the internet has increased opportunities to enlighten Japanese Internet users about historical truth which have been hidden by left-leaning mass media.  As a result, it has become known that China has been spreading lies about the Nanking Massacre to the world.   Over the past dozen years or so, Tanaka Masaaki, Kitamura Minoru, Higashinakano Shudo, Ara Kenichi and other many Japanese historians have inspected each single photographic evidence that China is presenting to prove Japanese soldiers’ atrocities in Nanking.   For example, China is presenting many photos as evidence of the Nanking Massacre.  The total number of photos that China is presenting is 143.  Surprisingly, it has been revealed that all 143 photos that China is presenting as photographic evidence turned out to be fake or utterly irrelevant to the Nanking Massacre.  That is, there is not a single photographic evidence of Japanese soldiers’ atrocities in Nanking.  However, China keeps presenting these fake photos as evidence at the Nanjing Massacre Memorial Hall opened in 1985.   Higashinakano Shudo’s inspection on 143 photographic evidence was published as a book in January 2005.

I think you are still half in doubt.  I hope you are not upset.  Please bear with me for a moment.  Furthermore,   when Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao visited Japan in April 2007, ‘Committee for the Examination of the Facts about Nanking’ published open letter to Jiabao.  The open questions are follows.
1) The late-leader Mao Zedong never mentioned the Nanking Massacre.
2) Between December 1, 1937 and October 24, 1938 the Chinese Nationalist Party Government (Kuomintang) held 300 press conferences with foreign journalists in Hankou.  But the Chinese Nationalist Party never mentioned “citizens being massacred in Nanking,” or “hostages being murdered unlawfully”.
3) According to the record published as a book by the International Committee for the Nanking Safety Zone (Ernest Forster, John Rabe, Lewis Strong, Casey Smythe, Eduard Sperling, George Fitch and so on) in 1939,  the population of Nanking stood at 200,000 prior to the Japanese occupation. This population level remained unchanged during December. Records show the population to be 250,000 one month after the Japanese occupation of the city began.
4) What is more, in this book published by the International Committee for the Nanking Safety Zone, there is a list of detailed complaints against the Japanese army’s criminal activities. The list includes a total of 26 murder incidents, of which only one case was witnessed but it was judged to be a lawful killing and thus noted in the book.
5) Numerous photographs said to be proof of the Nanking massacre are being displayed in books and at many exhibitions including the Nanjing Massacre Memorial Hall in Nanking. However, it has been revealed by scientific studies that there is not a single authentic photograph offering proof the massacre actually happened.

China claims that more than 200,000 people including ordinary citizens were killed by the Japanese army for two months after the fall of Nanking in December 13, 1937.  There must have been a giant pile of dead bodies if it is true.  However, not a single corpse has been found yet.  I know some corpses are exhibited in the Nanjing Massacre Memorial Hall.  But those corpses have not been examined into the cause of deaths.  Where did this Memorial Hall bring those corpses from?

Do you know the Katyn Massacre?  The Katyn Massacre is a hair-raising historical incident that more than 20,000 Polish officers were killed by Stalin-era Soviet military in 1940.  This incident was exposed to the world by Nazi Germany which found out massacred corpses of Polish officers near the forests of Katyn in February 27,  1943.  Nazi Germany investigated the cause of those deaths and strongly condemned Soviet for Katyn Massacre as follows.
1) Ropes which were used to bind corpses turned out to be Soviet-made.  Ropes were tied the Russian knot.
2) Some corpses had bayonet scars.  This bayonet turned out to be the Soviet military’s.
3) It is estimated that those Polish officers were killed around April of 1940 from issued date of Russian newspapers which a lot of Polish corpses had in their pockets.
4) Bullets shot into corpses turned out to be Germany-made.  But Nazi Germany proved that bullets had been exported to Poland and Soviet before 1939.
After the war, however, Soviet tried to frame Germany up for the Katyn Massacre at Nuremberg Trials (1945-1946) even though Soviet committed and knew it.  It had been regarded as taboo to get to the bottom of the Katyn Massacre in Poland under Sovietized socialist regime (1945-1989).  In 1990, Gorbachev Administration of Soviet disclosed documents that Stalin ordered the Soviet military to kill Polish captives.

Do you understand the differences between Katyn and Nanking?  First of all, a murder case needs a corpse or a dead body.  The Nanking Massacre is believed as a kind of mass murder. However, the Nanking Massacre is mass murder which is supported only by eyewitness testimonies.  To find out a dead body is the first step in the investigation of a murder.  So it is natural that the people, who want to get to the bottom of the Nanking Massacre, should find out corpses of victims first.  Because there are a lot of eyewitness testimonies of the people who saw Japanese soldiers’ atrocities in Nanking 1937, right?  Why the people, who want to get to the bottom of the Nanking Massacre, don’t try to find out corpses based on eyewitness testimonies?  I know the Nanjing Massacre Memorial Hall exhibits corpses.  But why the Memorial Hall keeps refusing to accept Japanese investigation team?  It seems that China doesn’t want get to the bottom of the Nanking Massacre even though China is eager to produce propaganda movies about the Nanking Massacre.  Therefore, I always describe the Nanking Massacre as Victimless Murder.  The crucial difference between Katyn and Nanking is the difference between historical fact and hoax.

In a moment of cool-headed, it becomes clear that the Nanking Massacre is a questionable story.  Why do you think I got angry at Ishihara’s comment a dozen years ago?  Why I lost my cool then?  Because I was brainwashed and I had been implanted aggression (=righteous anger) against denier into my mind to prevent from cooling down. When and where was I implanted it?  And more, there is a very important thing that we forget about China.  This is the true genocide, the true holocaust and the true ethnic cleansing are ongoing in China now.  We must not forget more than 1.28 million Tibetan people were killed for the past 60 years since 1949 that China took over Tibet.  I think that the hoax of the Nanking Massacre is a distraction that China threw to the international society for the purpose of distracting the world’s attention from the Rape of Tibet.

P.S. – August 28, 2010

Please check the video below.  (*It is not my account.)  This is the Video titled “the Fake of Nanking” that I uploaded to YouTube in May 2007.  I produced this video to expose the fake of the Nanking Massacre that America and China fabricated for the purpose of setting Japan up as the hideous rogue nation in wartime.  America produced a wartime propaganda movie titled “the Battle of China” (directed by Frank Capra, 65 min) to foment American people’s hatred toward the Japanese people in 1944, when WW2 was near its end.  In the Battle of China, there is the scene, where the mysterious soldiers who look like Japanese soldiers,  shoot two persons to death as Japanese soldiers’ atrocities in Nanking.  The scene where the mysterious soldiers shoot two persons to death was exposed as Kuomintang soldiers (KMT or Chinese Nationalist Party) to the public.  Moreover,  the scene where Kuomintang soldiers shoot two persons turned out to be a part of “the Shanghai Document”  (directed by Yakov Bliokh,  54 min) that was produced as a documentary movie (in the former Soviet Union in 1928.  What is more, Frank Capra trimmed away the part of Kuomintang soldiers from the film of “the Shanghai Document”,  additionally,  Frank Capra inserted the footage of a Japanese officer’s crying “Hajime!”(=start in Japanese) into this scene to make this footage look like that Japanese soldiers’ atrocities.  The Nanking Massacre is believed to have happened in December 1937.  Why do you think Frank Capra used the 1928 Shanghai’s footage as a 1937 Nanking’s footage in the Battle of China?  Because there was no footage that proved the Nanking Massacre when Frank Capra produced “the Battle of China” in 1944.  So he had no alternative but to make up the scene of Japanese soldiers’ atrocities with trimming away the footage of Kuomintang soldiers from the Shanghai Document.

P.S. – August 30, 2010

I know there are a lot of the people (self-proclaimed survivors) who witnessed Japanese soldiers’ atrocities at the time in Nanking.  I know there are some former Japanese soldiers who give testimony that they massacred Chinese civilians, too.  I know there are plenty of testimonies.  However, we should understand that testimony is testimony, testimony doesn’t have the same meaning of evidence and testimony always needs to be verified its credibility.  We should think back on what happened during the height of the Cultural Revolution (1966-1974) in China.  It is the age of madness.  Chinese people criticized each other and injured each other’s reputations by telling lies to survive under the fierce power struggle.  It is said that more than innocent 30 million people were framed up by others’ false accusations, were put on mockery trial by anonymous tip or testimonies, and most of them were executed for crimes they did not commit.  The more we know about Chinese history, the less we can believe Chinese people’s testimonies.  We should understand the racial characteristic of Han Chinese.  We should understand how incredible Han Chinese people are.  Do you think I am racist?  I think you want my opinion about why there are former Japanese soldiers who testify that they committed atrocities against Chinese people. So let me tell my opinion as follows.  If a person gives testimony relating to what the Japanese Imperial Army committed against the enemy or civilians,  he needs to give out identifying information (name, birth date, birth place and so on) and attached unit of the Japanese army.  Because their testimonies have effects on the Japan’s and Japanese ancestors’ honor.  However, almost former Japanese soldiers, who give testimony that they massacred Chinese civilians, always tell irresponsible lies about their identifying information.  Who can believe testimonies of self-proclaimed former Japanese soldiers who never clearly identify themselves?

Please check PHOTOS OF NANKING MASSACRE

TAMAGAWABOAT oyaji011.gif
To the top

映画「ザ・コーヴ」の上映はすべて中止すべきだ June 4, 2010

Posted by TAMAGAWABOAT in Blogroll, Frank Capra, Japan, Japan Bashing, racism, whaling.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
4 comments

テロの手法には大きく2通りある-反捕鯨を口実とした反日プロパガンダ映画「ザ・コーヴ」の日本国内での劇場公開が、ある劇場では6月下旬ごろからと決まったらしい。ある人々は言う。「ある特定団体(右翼)が配給会社や劇場に対して圧力かけて『ザ・コーヴ』を上映中止に追い込んでいる。08年の映画・靖国YASUKUNIの再現だ。今ふたたび表現の自由が危機に晒されている。表現の自由を守ろう!」と。さらには「映画を観ずして批判するな!批判は映画を観てからにしろ!」と常套文句を用いた映画宣伝へと誘導しようとする連中がいる。私はこうした論調に対し、ぜひとも日本人自身の力で、映画「ザ・コーヴ」の上映を断固阻止すべきだと、信念を持ってそう思っている。なぜならば、この「ザ・コーヴ」の実態をよくよくみれば、南氷洋において日本の調査捕鯨船に対し繰り返し危険なテロ攻撃を行ってきたシー・シェパードがスポンサーとなっている映画であるということ(そのように公表されていなくてもそうなのだ)に気づくはずだ。そして、予め頭の中に抑えておかなければならないことは、テロの手法には、物理的なテロと精神的なテロの2通りあるということ。精神的なテロとは、メディアを通じた情報操作や映像を通じて、テロの目的を遂行しようとすること。この映画「ザ・コーヴ」は、まさに精神テロの使命を帯びたシー・シェパードのプロパガンダ映画なのだ。ゆえに、「テロに屈しない!」という文言通り、この映画を日本で絶対に上映させてはならないのである。それでもなお、「映画を観ずして批判するな。表現の自由に対する弾圧だ」などと言い続けている連中は、私からみれば、日本国内へ危険な「トロイの木馬」を引き入れようとする工作員である。

敵のプロパガンダを封じ込める-映画「ザ・コーヴ」をドキュメンタリーなどと絶対に呼ばないでいただきたい。もし、そう呼ぶならば、1944年のフランク・キャプラ作品の「ザ・バトル・オブ・チャイナ(The Battle of China)」までもがドキュメンタリーとなってしまう。プロパガンダには、はっきりと「プロパガンダ」という呼称を用いるべきだ。それでも「ザ・コーヴ」をドキュメンタリーと呼ぼうとする人間は、ドキュメンタリーとプロパガンダの違いを考えたことのない人であるか、よほど何かしら特殊な意図または任務を持った人である。なんと言おうと、ヤラセ・捏造に満ちた映画「ザ・コーヴ」には、ドキュメンタリーかプロパガンダかといった議論の余地はもはや無い。シー・シェパードが世界と日本に向けて仕掛けた正真正銘のプロパガンダである。この映画は、シー・シェパードの言うところの「クジラ戦争-Whale Wars (アニマル・プラネットにて世界中で放送中、ただし日本だけ放送されていない)」における重要な作戦なのだ。そのプロパガンダにどう対処するか、それがいまの我々に問われている課題である。「ザ・コーヴ」に対して反証する映画もいいだろうが、とりあえず、まず早急に打たなくてはならない対処は、日本人に仕掛けようとしてくる精神テロを水際で排除すること。すなわち、国内における劇場での「ザ・コーヴ」の上映を阻止することである。おそらく、「ザ・コーヴ」をプロモートする連中は、それを逆手にとり、「右翼の圧力によって上映中止に追い込まれたザ・コーヴ」などと宣伝に利用しようとするだろう。しかし同時に、シー・シェパードやグリーンピースなどによる欺瞞に満ちた反捕鯨論に対して、その嘘や捏造を暴く絶好の機会でもあるのだ。まずは、世界に配信される海外メディアを通じて、「ザ・コーヴの日本での上映中止」というニュースを配信させ、反捕鯨団体のテロに対して怒っている日本人たちの存在を印象付ける機会としようではないか、仕掛けられたテロに対して、黙って屈することはない。果敢にテロと闘う日本人の姿を世界に見せつけようではないか!

捕鯨論争は嘘とプロパガンダに満ちている-「日本の捕鯨が鯨を絶滅に追いやっている」「鯨の知能指数は人間と同じくらい高い」「鯨食は日本の文化とは言えない」「日本の鯨食は、戦後の学校給食で始まった」「日本の調査捕鯨は商業捕鯨だ」…などなど、さまざまな嘘が反捕鯨団体および外国のメディアによって世界中にばら撒かれている。さらには、日本人の一部までがそれを信じ、捕鯨推進派の日本人たちを罵ろうとする。「鯨肉なんて要らない。日本人の多くは食べたくないんだ。あんなもの美味しくもない。捕鯨問題で、日本は世界中の評判を落としている。鯨なんて食べなくても、牛や豚などの家畜の肉を食えばいいだろう」などと言う日本人がいる。もう完璧に出来あがってしまって、反捕鯨の「白人」のお面をつけてしまっている。日本人はこれまでずっと海の幸・恵みをいただきながら生活してきた。海岸の岩にへばりついている海苔、そこに転がるウニをはじめとして、たくさんの魚、そしてイルカに鯨。この日本の多様で豊かな食生活が日本の文化を支えてきたのだ。今年、話題になったマグロ捕獲量についての国際会議を見て、日本がこれまで食料として確保してきた海の恵みが、英米を中心とした欧米によって鯨以外にもさまざまな種類の魚を制限しようとしていることを理解した人たちも多いと思う。鯨の次は沿岸のイルカ、そしてマグロ、さらにカツオ…理不尽でごう慢な圧力を日本にかけ、日本の食卓を無理やり変革させようとしてきた。思い返せば、1976年、アメリカが200海里漁業専管水域を設定、ロシア、カナダはそれに追従し、日本の漁船が世界中の漁場から締め出されていった。

和歌山県太地町には日本の未来が託されている-自分が鯨の肉を食べないから嫌いだからという理由で、「鯨肉なんて食べなくても他に食べ物はたくさんあるだろ。捕鯨なんてやめてしまえ」という日本人がいる。そんな人に出会うと、私は次のような話をする。「私が大阪に1年間ほど住んでいたが、大抵の大阪の人は納豆の話になると、眼を釣りあげて『あんな足のムレたような臭いのするもん、食べんでええ』と東日本の食文化である納豆を口撃しようとするんだ。鯨もそれと同じだ。自分が食べていないからって、それを非難することはおかしい。それに人間の味覚は小学校2~3年生ぐらいで確立してしまうらしい。私が生まれて初めて牛肉を食べたのが小学校3年ぐらいだったと思う。母親が牛肉の、それも今思えば、サーロインのようないい肉を買ってきて、家で焼いて食べさせてくれたことがある。その時のこと今でも憶えている。そして母親には悪いこと言っちゃたなぁと思うけど、『母ちゃん、この肉は食えんよ。牛乳臭くて美味しくないよ』と言ったんだ。だからこそ、私は日本人みんなに言いたいんだ。いまの20代の日本人が鯨肉を必要ないと言うのは当然。食い付けていないんだよ。だからこそ、いまの小学校の給食で、もっともっと精力的に鯨肉を食べさせてあげなくちゃいけないんだ。子供の頃に食べ慣れさせることが重要なんだ。それを怠ってしまうと日本の捕鯨は本当に無くなってしまうんだ」と。日本の背中の後ろあたりに中国という国があり13億人の胃袋が控えている。これまで日本は世界最大の食料輸入国であったが、中国はまもなく日本を抜き、世界最大の食料輸入国となる。その時、日本が輸入している豚肉や牛肉は本当に安定供給され続けるのだろうか?日本の食料自給率はすでに40%を大きく下回ってしまった(61年80%→05年40%)。この極端に低い食料自給率は、日本の安全保障上にかかわる問題じゃないのか。ある日本人が言う。「日本の調査捕鯨なんて名ばかりで、実態は商業捕鯨じゃないか」と。私は笑いながら答える。「名ばかりで何が悪い?この調査捕鯨をやめてしまえば、これまで培われてきた日本の捕鯨技術とノウハウ。そしてその捕鯨船団と技術を持った乗組員たちはどうなるか?いったんそれらが失われてしまうと、いざという時、今の船団を構成するのにどれほどの年月がかかるか?もう再構築は無いんだよ。だからこの貴重な捕鯨船団、その灯火を消しちゃならないんだ!調査捕鯨は、いざというときのためのアイドリングと考えたほうがいい。それにしても、日本の捕鯨を感情的に攻撃しながら、商業捕鯨を堂々と行っている国があるのを知っているか?それがアメリカだ。彼らはアラスカでのエスキモーのために毎年、絶滅危惧種のホッキョククジラの捕獲数を確保している(※ホッキョククジラの生存数は約9000頭)。これこそ先住民生存捕鯨といった名ばかりの商業捕鯨なのだ。クジラの工芸品がアラスカのウェブサイトで販売されているのを私は見た。アメリカの欺瞞を許してはならない。私はアメリカのエスキモーに次のように言ってやりたいね。絶滅に瀕しているホッキョククジラ以外に他に食うものあるだろうって(笑)。いまや21世紀、スーパーマーケットでトナカイの肉やコンビーフの缶詰でも買って食べたらどうだ?アメリカ政府から手厚い生活保護でも貰っている身分なのだろうから…と。反捕鯨団体はアメリカの先住民生存捕鯨を容認している。反捕鯨団体はその理由を捕鯨がエスキモーの文化だからと主張する。絶滅危惧種であるホッキョククジラを守りたいのか、エスキモーの文化を守りたいのか矛盾してはいないか?反捕鯨団体は本当に自然保護団体なのか、それとも文化保護団体なのか…まさか人種差別団体ではあるまいな(笑)。そして、だからこそ江戸初期から続く古式捕鯨を生んだ和歌山県太地町のイルカ漁を『文化』と呼びたくないのでしょ?」と。私たち日本人は、将来の子供たちのために捕鯨と鯨食を大切に守っていかなければならない。それを日本国内から妨害しようとする反捕鯨団体の策略としての欺瞞に満ちたプロパガンダ映画「ザ・コーヴ」はいかなる手段を持ってしても粉砕すべきなのである。「表現の自由」や「見たいものを見る権利を守ろう」などとナイーヴな意見を主張する以前に、これは「日本の安全保障に関わる問題」であり「日本人の生存権が脅かされている問題」であることをよく考えてもらいたい。そこんとこ、ひとつよろしく。


シーシェパード制作の「ザ・コーヴ」に表現の自由を認めない
卑劣なプロパガンダ映画「ザ・コーヴ」
THE COVE – A Despicable Propaganda Movie
WHAT’S THE PURPOSE OF ANTI-WHALING?

TAMAGAWABOAT oyaji-beer1.gif
トップページから読む

THE CROPPING IN THE BATTLE OF CHINA February 10, 2008

Posted by TAMAGAWABOAT in Blogroll, Frank Capra, Nanking Massacre, Rape of Nanking, WW2.
8 comments

fireflies012.jpg“The Battle of China” is the U.S.Defense Department’s war-time propaganda film that Frank Capra (1897-1991) directed in order to stir up enmity against Japan. This film was released in the United States in 1944. This film aroused American’s sympathy for Chinese people and succeeded in gaining support for indiscriminate bombing of Japanese cities from American public opinion.  the_battle_of_china.jpgAs a result, Japanese 66 cities were burnt down and more than 800,000 innocent and unarmed Japanese people (including Hiroshima and Nagasaki) were made victims of America’s bare-knuckled bombing strikes.

frank_capra_editing.jpg“The Battle of China” may be still thought to be historical facts of Sino-Japanese War (1937 – 1945) among not only Chinese people but also  people all over the world. On the other hand, in Japan, many atrocities’ footage in “The Battle of China” has been thought to be occupied by either “staged footage” or “unrelated footage” for a long time. As it were, “The Battle of China” is the promoter to have distorted historical facts of Sino-Japanese War. However, there wasn’t a person who proved staged footages of “The Battle of China” by evidence in the past.

shanghai_document_poster.jpgTwo years ago, when I watched a film (another film disconnected from “The Battle of China”) by accident, I noticed something familiar footage in this film. I didn’t know the title of this film at the time. A few weeks later, I unexpectedly met this familiar footage that I watched in “The Battle of China”.  I assured that “The battle of China” trimmed off a right half of the original image at the time. (Cropping/Trimming) This questionable footage stepped on the part of “the fall of Nanking” in “The Battle of China”. The left half of the original image showed as if two men were shot on a Japanese officer’s orders in Nanking of 1937. This footage of executions in “The Battle of China” has been thought that Japanese soldiers shot to kill Chinese citizens from behind. Two men have been thought to be shot on Japanese officer’s orders.  Because Japanese officer’s face appeared once in “The Battle of China” and gave an order to shoot them dead.   Meanwhile, this right half of the original image showed a few soldiers who put on never-seen-before uniforms and had rifles at the ready. However, I found out what never-seen-before uniforms were at once.

cropping_battle_of_china.jpg

boysoldiers.jpgThese uniforms turned out to be Chinese Kuomintang’s one (=Chinese Nationalist Party). The original film showed Chinese Kuomintang’s soldiers actually killed two Chinese communists by shooting. I suppose these Chinese soldiers were boys. Because they were very short and had somewhat gawky movements. And more, Chinese Nationalist Party recruited so many boys as soldiers in those days.

Frank Capra trimmed off the right half of the original image that showed Chinese Kuomintang (KMT) soldiers were holding rifles at the ready on purpose. And more, he inserted the film of an unrelated Japanese officer’s face into this “shooting death” scene. This scene turned out to be “staged scene”. And yet, this cropped footage proves Frank Capra gave Japanese soldiers bum-rap for barbaric atrocities. As it turned out afterwards, this original film’s title is 412incident_shanghai1928.jpg“The Shanghai Document” (Шанхайский документ) and was released in 1928 in the Soviet era. “The Shanghai Document” was shot in Shanghai and dealt with “The April 12 Incident (= Shanghai Massacre 1927)” that Chiang Kai-shek’s Chinese Kuomintang clamped down Shanghai Commune by brute force. It estimated that more than 300 Chinese Communists were executed by Chinese Kuomintang (KMT) Army. (* The Shanghai Document: Yakov Blyokh [Яков Блиох],1895-1957)


http://youtube.com/watch?v=4LbVeadjSbo
THE FAKE OF NANKING-1

Please check Do you still believe Nanking Massacre?
                           THE PHOTOS OF NANKING MASSACRE
                           THE RAPE OF NANKING=THE FAKE OF NANKING 

TAMAGAWABOAT oyaji011.gif

To the top page

PHOTOS OF NANKING MASSACRE January 9, 2007

Posted by TAMAGAWABOAT in Blogroll, Frank Capra, History, Japan Bashing, Japanese, Nanking Massacre, Rape of Nanking, Ted Leonsis, WW2, Yasukuni.
Tags: ,
154 comments

It was around 1989 that China started energetically conducting anti-Japanese education on school children.  Please think back on what happened around 1989 in the world.  As you may know, in Eastern Europe, socialist countries turned toward democratization one after another and socialist system collapsed in a blink of an eye.  In the same year 1989,  around the middle of April,  in China’s capital city Beijing, a lot of ordinary people mainly university students started gathering in Tiananmen Square to appeal for democratization. About one and a half months after that, there were more than 100,000 people in Tiananmen Square.  Furthermore, the democratic movement that started in Tiananmen Square grew and spread throughout the country. The Chinese Communist Party, which had a sense of crisis about the democratic movement’s growing momentum then, cracked down on more than 100,000 people with military weapons on June 4, 1989.  It led to bloodshed.  This is the Tiananmen Square incident.

After the Tiananmen Square incident, the Chinese Communist Party, which tried desperately to maintain single-party regime then, set up Japan as an imaginary enemy and decided to strengthen anti-Japanese education to turn public dissatisfaction with politics toward Japan.  The Chinese Communist Party started putting its energy into implanting deep-seated grudge against Japan in school children’s mind.  The Chinese Communist Party included many blood-thirsty photos of so-called “the Nanking Massacre” of “Japanese soldier’s atrocities” in history textbooks for Chinese school children.  Surprisingly, however, there is not a single photo that proves that the Nanking Massacre happened actually,  moreover,  there is not a single photo that proves even that Japanese soldiers committed atrocities against Chinese people.  I can hear your angry voice such as “No way! You’ve got to be kidding, right?”  It is natural that the people who believe the Nanking Massacre should be disagreeably surprised to hear that.

Do you know how many photos China is presenting as photos of the Nanking Massacre?  Do you know how many photos is the Nanking Massacre Memorial Hall (in Nanjing) exhibiting to prove Japanese soldiers’ atrocities in Nanking 1937?  There are 143 photos in all.  A professor of intellectual history at Asia University, Higashinakano Shudo examined each of those 143 photos for several years.  Higashinakano investigated each of those 143 photos scholastically and indicate the source of each photo. (ex.. who shot it? when/where was it shot? when was it released to the public for the first time?)  At last, Higashinakano reached a conclusion that all 143 photos that China is presenting are fake, fabricated or utterly irrelevant to the Nanking Massacre.  That is to say, there is not a single photo that proves that there was the Massacre in Nanking 1937.  And he compiled a whole book of this conclusion and published “Analyzing the Photographic Evidence of Nanking Massacre” in 2005.  His book was sold one hundred thousand for one year from it was first published.  And he appeared in the several TV show.  Therefore, putting aside the argument whether the Nanking Massacre or not, among the Japanese people, there has been growing recognition that China is presenting dubious photos in the name of Nanking Massacre’s photos even though there is not a single photo to prove the Nanking Massacre.

Do you know when the Nanking Massacre Memorial Hall (in Nanjing) opened?  It opened in 1985 that 48 years had passed since 1937 that the Nanking Massacre is thought to have happened.  Both Hiroshima Atomic Bomb Museum and Nagasaki’s Museum opened in 1955 that 4 years passed since 1951 that Japan’s autonomy was restored with the conclusion of the San Francisco Peace Treaty. (=They opened 10 years after the war ended.)  Do you wonder what did China do for the pest 48 years?  In all of quotations from Chairman Mao Zedong (1893 – 1976) ,  Mao Zedong did not have a word out about the Nanking Massacre.  Do you know when Iris Chang (1968 – 2004) published “the Rape of Nanking”?  She published the book in 1997 for the first time.  Iris Chang said that she was shown photos of the Nanking Massacre at Chinese American’s meeting in 1994,  was shocked by the cruelty of Japanese soldiers and decided to write a book.  Two years later after that, Iris Chang took two years to write “The Rape of Nanking”.  “The Rape of Nanking” was sold over half a million and became a bestseller in America.  It’s not an exaggeration to say that “the Rape of Nanking” expanded awareness of the Nanking Massacre to the world.

Meanwhile, almost Japanese people didn’t know what were written in “the Rape of Nanking”.  Because it was 2008 that “the Rape of Nanking” was published in Japanese.  Iris Chang wanted to publish her book in Japan earlier.  But the Japanese publishing company, Kashiwa Shobo, which Iris Chang asked to publish Japanese version of this book,  oppositely advised Iris Chang to correct many errors of “the Rape of Nanking” before translating English into Japanese.  The Japanese publisher, Kashiwa Shobo said to Iris Chang, “As you may know, in Japan, there are controversy as to whether the Nanking Massacre happened or not.  So in Japan, some historians  insist the Nanking Massacre happened, but other historians deny the Nanking Massacre as absolutely groundless.  Your “the Rape of Nanking” are pointed out more than 90 errors by both sides of historians.  Especially, most of 90 errors were caused by lack of knowledge about Japanese history at the Japanese compulsory education level.  Can you publish such a book without any correction in Japan?”  But Iris Chang did never take advice from the Japanese publisher.  According to Iris Chang,  she heard the story of the Nanking Massacre from her parents, she learned it, she looked photos of the Nanking Massacre and she was shocked at pictures of Japanese soldiers’ atrocities.  In other words, Iris Chang believed hoax, she was shocked at fake pictures and she wrote a cheap novel.  In 2008, “the Rape of Nanking” was translated textually into Japanese and was published in Japan.  “The Rape of Nanking” has become generally recognized as a nonsense novel among the Japanese.

TAMAGAWABOAT   oyaji-beer2.gif

To the top

Please check  
DO YOU STILL BELIEVE NANKING MASSACRE?
RAPE OF NANKING” is “FAKE OF NANKING
THE ANTI-JAPANESE EDUCATION IN CHINA

Yasukuni Shrine – 1
Sugihara Chiune – A Japanese Holocaust Rescuer


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Db4vorG0ug

 


www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LbVeadjSbo

DO YOU STILL BELIEVE NANKING MASSACRE?
| PHOTOS OF NANKING MASSACRE THE NEWS OF NANJING MASSACRE |  THE TRUTH OF NANJING MASSACRE  | ANTI-JAPAN EDUCATION IN CHINA |  THE PEACEFUL NEW YEAR 1938 IN NANJING  | “RAPE OF NANKING” is “FAKE OF NANKING” NOBODY WITNESSED MURDERS ACTUALLY  | RABE IS NANJING’s SUGIHARA!? NO WAY!! | TESTIMONY IS NOT EVIDENCE TED LEONSIS SCATTERS THE PROTOCOLS OF THE ELDERS OF ZION |JAPAN FOUGHT AGAINST NAZIS IN CHINA | THE PROPOSAL FOR FILM “NANKING”  |“NANKING” is Documentary or Propaganda? |Do you still believe Nanking Massacre?

%d bloggers like this: