THE RAPE OF NANKING=THE FAKE OF NANKING
February 5, 2008
If sexual assaults (rape) occur frequently during a certain short period in a certain area, the pregnancy rate in this area should naturally increase dramatically after a set period of time. This is human’s physiological phenomenon. Simultaneously, the venereal-disease epidemic in this area should happen.
On May 2nd of 1945, fall of Berlin, capital city of Germany. Half a m
illion Soviet soldiers (Red Army) rolled into Berlin in bursts and Berlin was inundated with Russian soldiers. At that time, 1,495,500 German women left behind in Berlin. The total number of pregnancy-aged women was about 600,000 in Berlin. More than 100,000 German women were victimized by Russian soldiers’ sexual assaults(rape). The number of rape victims represents 6.7% of all German women left behind in Berlin then. As a result, 10,000 German women killed themselves. According to “People, Years, Life”(1964) written by Ilja Erenburg (Илья Григорьевич Эренбург 1891-1967), Ilja Erenburg himself 
whipped up Russian soldiers with the following words, “Steal blonde German dish! They are spoils of victory!” This tragedy went on for 3 days from fall of Berlin to other Allied Forces entering Berlin. Moreover, Russian soldiers’ assaults were not just confined to Berlin but also whole land of Germany that Red Army made entry. It’s estimated that more than 2 million German women were sexually assaulted throughout East Germany.
As a result, what happened? “BeFreier und Befreite”(1992) says, according to the consultation list of Charite Hospital, From July 23rd of 1945 to the end of 1945, the amount of women that consulted Obstetrics and Gynecology was 3,852. The number of rape survivors was 514 (13%) out of 3,852. The number of pregnant women was 118 (23%) out of 514. The number of women that underwent abortion was 37 (31%) out of 118. The number of women that had miscarriage (abortion) was 3 (1%) out of 37. Thus, if 10 pregnancy-aged women are sexually assaulted (raped), 2.3 out of 10 women will become pregnant stochastically. This is human’s physiological phenomenon. This is reality.
According to “The Rape of Nanking” published by Iris Chang in 1997, Iris Chang asserts 
that the total number of rape survivors is at least 20,000 to 80,000 in Nanking. She asserts that unprecedented assaults were caused by barbaric Japanese soldiers after the fall of Nanking. She asserts that hungry concupiscence Japanese soldiers raped an raped during two weeks from December 13th to the end of 1937. Judging “The Rape of Nanking” against the pregnancy rate of “The Rape of Berlin”, 23% of rape survivors should have become pregnant against their will. 23%…this means at least 4,600 to 18,400 Chinese women should have become pregnant after a set period of time. And more, “The baby boom” should have taken place in Nanking 10 months after the fall of Nanking. And yet, about 10,000 Japanese-Chinese half-blood babies should have been born. Where these pregnant Chinese women were gone? Where about 10,000 Japanese-descended Chinese babies were gone? I’m hoping to see descendants of Japanese-Chinese half-blood in Nanking.
“The Rape of Nanking” is out of human’s physiological phenomenon. “The Rape of Nanking” is out of touch with reality. Iris Chang lived in a fantasy world. If you have a common sense, you will know how “The Rape of Nanking” is so inaccurate book contrary to your expectation. “The Rape of Nanking” got published in the United States in 1997. At first, Iris Chang wanted to publish this book also in Japan. “The Rape of Nanking” was already pointed out 90 errors as “earthy novel” when she offered this book’s translation to a Japanese publisher. These 90 errors on this book were basic enough to that everyone could point out if they learned basic Japanese history. So, this Japanese publisher urged Iris Chang to adjust errors because he was afraid of becoming a laughingstock in Japan. However, Iris Chang never accepted this Japanese publisher’s request because she was stubborn. Therefore, there was not Japanized version of “The Rape of Nanking” till fairly recently. So, most Japanese people don’t know what this book says. “The Rape of Nanking” got published on December 17th last year (2007).
“The Rape of Nanking” was, after all, “The Fake of Nanking”.
Please check “The Cropping in The Battle of China“
and “Photos of Nanking Massacre“, too.
ある一定期間において、数万件の強姦が発生したのなら、ある一定の時間が経過した後に、集中して妊娠という現象が劇的に急増するのは、人間の生理的な理である。同時に性病の流行も引き起こす。そして強姦が集中した１０ヶ月後には、ある種のベビーブームが訪れる。1945年のベルリン陥落時には、約10万人のドイツ女性が赤軍のソ連兵に強姦され、１万人が自殺したとされている。その10万人の強姦を受けた女性たちの23%が妊娠し、そのうちの31%が中絶し、残りのほとんどがソ連兵の子供を生んだ。これらの事実は、ベルリンの病院に残された産婦人科の受診簿が語っている。アイリス・チャンは南京で2万から8万人の女性が日本兵から強姦を受けたと主張している。ベルリンで起こった事件に照らし合わせて考えてみると、南京事件の１０ヶ月後には、数千人から２万人近くの日本兵の子供が一斉に生まれる「日本兵ベービー」のブームが南京で起こったはずだ。南京市民の数％に日本人の血が流れていることになる。人類はみな兄弟だ。
TAMAGAWABOAT 
Entry Filed under: Blogroll, History, Nanking Massacre, Rape of Nanking, WW2. .
22 Comments Add your own
Leave a Comment
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
Trackback this post | Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed
1.
Takaya | February 6, 2008 at 2:59 am
ありがとうございます、勉強になりました。
12月７日に出版されていたとは知りませんでした。
2. 南京大虐殺を世界に宣伝する日本大使館 « as subjectively as possible | February 11, 2008 at 11:20 am
[...] check THE RAPE OF NANKING=THE FAKE OF NANKING and THE CROPPING IN THE BATTLE OF [...]
3. TESTIMONY IS NOT EVIDENCE « as subjectively as possible | February 11, 2008 at 11:23 am
[...] check THE RAPE OF NANKING=THE FAKE OF NANKING and THE CROPPING IN THE BATTLE OF [...]
4. THE CROPPING IN THE BATTLE OF CHINA « as subjectively as possible | February 12, 2008 at 8:17 pm
[...] subjectively as possible Don’t be a slave to convention! « THE RAPE OF NANKING=THE FAKE OF NANKING 「南京の真実を言えば相手は理解する」日本人の勝手な思い込み。 [...]
5.
nankingfosho | March 4, 2008 at 9:02 am
You need psychotherapy.
6.
KJ | March 30, 2008 at 9:28 pm
the point is Japanese people never accepted a truth that they invaded other countries in WWII, and they killed millions of people, not only Chinese, but also others.
And no related history is mentioned in the book for students in Japan and nobody wanted to tell the truth to the next generation. that is sad.
Comparing with Japanese, German is respectable. From Sat3, historical documentation is frequently showned on the TV, to tell the people a true WWII.
what has Japanese done?????
7.
モンキー | April 9, 2008 at 2:23 am
多摩川ボートさん、レオンシスはチャンの「レイプオブ南京」を下敷きにして映画「南京」を作ったらしいですが、それをハッキリ指摘されたら貴殿の主張がさらに補強されると思います。「レイプ・オブ南京」が杜撰な本で取るに足りないということは、欧米の南京虐殺肯定の歴史家の間でさえ常識になっているようですから。
それから、貴殿の英語はこなれていて自然ですが失礼ながら日本語的発想からくる多少の誤りもあり、また口語的に過ぎるのでそれを改めたらさらに説得的になると思います。
以下は、貴殿のTHE RAPE OF NANKING=THE FAKE OF NANKINGから。
“The Rape of Nanking” was already pointed out 90 errors as “earthy novel” 文法的にちょっとどうかな。それから、本の題名は、下線か斜字体にすべきだと思います。
“The Rape of Nanking” got published in the United States in 1997. got publishedは口語的に過ぎるのでは？
These 90 errors on this book were basic enough to that everyone could point out if they learned basic Japanese history. タイポ？
as subjectively as possibleとはいいながら、やはり英語はきちんとしたもののほうが効果があると思います。
8.
name | April 10, 2008 at 6:08 am
?I can’t even understand what all that japanese stuff says
9.
Professor J Smith | April 13, 2008 at 5:22 am
Great work; now you have proved beyond doubt that the Nanjing Massacre was a fake, you have to go on to show that the bombing of Pearl Harbour was dreamed up by US. Then you have do work on Manchuria, Malaya and the Pacific. You got work cut out for the rest of your life.
10.
Mr | May 7, 2008 at 10:40 pm
While we’re on the topic of the accuracy of Japanese history, talk about the Kojiki… enough said.
11.
RR | May 13, 2008 at 2:39 pm
Typical Japanese animal. You argue about whether its 10,000 or 300,000. The point is that Japan invaded and took advantage of a weak China but when China lost against the French and the British, our emissaries warned you of the West which caused your Meiji government to speed up modernizing your military.
Read the Asahi Shimbun. I am only repeating what a Japanese professor has said.
12.
ChinaKorea Buster | July 26, 2008 at 12:44 pm
History of Massacres on Chinese Continent
in Ch’ing (1636-1912), Republic of China (1912-1949), People’s Republic of China (1949-)
China has been transferring to Japan the crimes that Chinese Army committed against Chinese civilians during the civil wars.
Year & Incident Confirmed or Estimated Death Toll
1851 Taiping Rebellion 20 million to 80 million
1860 Muslim Rebellion 20 million to 30 million
1900-1901 Boxer Rebellion 757
1928 Jinan Incident by Chiang Kai-shek’s Kuo Min Tang 400 (Japanese only)
1928 Civil War (Kuo Min Tang vs Communist Red Army) 20 million
1937 Tsuushuu Incident by Chiang Kai-shek’s Kuo Min Tang 230 (Japanese only)
1938 Yellow River Bank Explosion Incident by Chiang Kai-shek’s Kuo Min Tang 1 million
1946 2nd Civil War (Kuo Min Tang vs Communist Red Army) 3 million
1946 East Turkistan by Mao Zedong’s Communist Red Army Over 10 million
1947 2.28 Incident in Taiwan by Chiang Kai-shek’s Kuo Min Tang 28,000 by Execution
1949 Tibet Massacre by Mao Zedong’s Communist Red Army Over 200,000
1951 Three-anti/five-anti campaigns by Mao Zedong’s Communist Red Army 710,000 by Execution
1958 -1960 Great Leap Forward by Mao Zedong’s Communist Red Army 20 million to 50 million
1966-1976 Cultural Revolution by Mao Zedong’s Communist Red Army 30 million
1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre 10,000 to 20,000
1989 Falun Gong Massacre 300 by Execution
Asahi Shinbun is notorious for having produced hundreds of fake news, and is now nothing but a source of laughter in Japan. Only idiots believe what Asahi writes.
The legitimacy of Manchu Empire was recognized by Soviet Union even though Manchu Empire accepted political refugees from Soviet Union.
Japan is the only nation during WW2 that accepted Jews as refugees from Europe.
The history texts used in Malaysia, India, Indonesia, and Philippines, write that Japan liberated these nations from Britain, Holland, and US, respectively. The national anthems of these nations specifically record that Japan Imperial Forces were holly forces sent by God to rescue these nations from the oppressions of the colonizers.
13.
Anonymous | July 29, 2008 at 12:16 pm
summing up massacres in other nations history is always fun, right ChinaKorea Buster??
And it is funny, that revisionists always come up with the same arguments…chinese tend to exxaggerate, they are brutal and commit lots of massacres…and the japanese don’t do that!
haha…how about the manyoshu…the famous collection of odes from the ninth century…the title indicates there should be 10.000 odes, but in fact there are only around 4.500. And actually revisionists ike Higashinakano say that japanese army officers used to exaggerate their death tolls or how many captives they made, just to show how great their bettlefield skills are. point is, everybody, every nation exaggerates….so what about massacres…are there any in japanese history. HOw about to mention the actions of one of the three unifiers of japan…Oda Nobunaga and his siege of Mount Hiei in 1571…rings a bell?? or what about 70 years later in Kyushu when the last Christians were prosecuted …Shimabara Rebellion…BELL??? Or let’s go back to Toyotomi Hideyoshi and his invasions to Korea…To prove how many soldiers the samurai killed, this time they didn’t bring back the heads, what they usually did…but instead brought the ears and noses of the enemy soldiers with them (and I bet they exaggerated by just killing a few civilians, just to provide som more ears) and later the infamous ear mound (Mimizuka) was errected near kyoto…never heard of it?? 耳塚 http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%80%B3%E5%A1%9A
so what does all this have to do with your list of chinese massacres….I just want to point out…every nation regardless of culture, language, skin color, gender or whatsoever is capable of commiting massacres, and has done so. Nanking was one…there is enough proof for the willing to read.
14.
Someone who likes Japan but not it's people | November 21, 2008 at 9:30 am
Most of the women were killed after being raped.
Why the fuck would they want to conceive the baby?
Some could’ve committed suicide because were traumatized psychologically or whatever
15.
mochu | February 15, 2009 at 10:23 pm
レイプオブ南京という本に掲載された写真がすべてでっちあげだったということは世界的に有名です。
それと、これに関係する日中のハーフは今のところ存在していません。
またドイツ、中国政府の証言の内容はあまりにも信憑性に欠けているため、レイプはおろか虐殺があったかどうかすら定かではありません。
中国の南京大虐殺記念館に展示されている写真のいくつかは、既に論理的、時系列的観点から偽物であることが証明されていますが、それらは未だ展示されつづけています。
中国政府は歴史的にあまりにも多くの嘘をついてきたため、国外はおろか、国内に対しても「嘘を隠すための嘘」をつきつづけています。
これは韓国政府にもおなじ事が言えますが、
言論の自由の無い国に真実の歴史は語れないのではないでしょうか。
16.
Anonymous | April 2, 2009 at 4:49 am
The reason the pregnancy rate was not increased was because the women were killed through rape in the first place. Think about it before you write something so extreme.
17.
Brizvegas | May 31, 2009 at 3:25 am
I am an australian living in tokyo, There are nemrous replies here showing how savage the japanese were but lf you look at them now, they are one of most desciplined, respectfull and peacefull people in the world and you can see that straight away if you live there. And i believe that their characteristics were not formed straight after the war but long before it.
The point is none of us were there at the “massacre” and most evidences are weak. Also because of the increasing interest in this topic, a lot of the weak evidnces are being proven wrong. Don’t just believe every information that demonises Japan but try researching more about japanese side of story because most of them were silenced due to the post war GHQ’s “WGI”(War Guilt Information program)http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389×146638
I don’t know which side is correct and i will stay this way until some genius invents a time machine but I do know that the japanese people are far from an “animal”.
18.
anti downright rudeness | June 16, 2009 at 1:35 pm
Glad that there are people with a common-sense view.
19.
Anonymous | June 17, 2009 at 3:10 am
u seriously believe some bull that was found on the internet.
Pshhh, II can see it now–ur future…Captain Obvious, Private !@#$ for hire
20.
Anonymous | May 31, 2009 at 4:00 am
Of course. The Germans are now one of the most disciplined, respectful, and peaceful people in the world. In fact, they were far from being “animals.” Why did they commit a genocide?
Also, even the Japanese, by the way, had an article in their own newspaper talking about how two of their officers slaughtered 200 Chinese for fun by cleaving their heads with katanas.
21.
truthofnanking | August 8, 2009 at 4:56 pm
http://www.truthofnanking.com/
22.
Brian | September 5, 2009 at 5:23 am
Japan is a wonderful country and its citizens are some of the most creative and hard working people in the world. I saw this first hand when I worked in Japan. I gained respect for their artistic culture and found most Japanese I met to be humble and kind. It is sad these forums bring out the worst in Japan, but historically, their country was a war-based nation–a truth they do admit. Yet, one disappointing aspect about the Japanese is how they do forget parts of their history which make them look bad. That is a very Japanese ‘face saving’ way of dealing with a dark side of their modern past as they don’t want to bring shame upon themselves. But it’s also part of an egotistical and superior attitude they cast on others who are not Japanese. Even when it comes to their museums, it was sad to go through a history museum in Tokyo and have the time line display ‘forget’ Pearl Harbor, but skip to their people being fire bombed in 1942. It was down-right insulting in the museum at Hiroshima now they portray a strong case as to why they were atom bombed, but only reserve a paragraph on the wall to explain their racially motivated totalitarian expansion across Asia. One of the things I found to be most ridiculous was their teaching of the Second World War to their young people. From time to time I’d ask Japanese students how they were learning about their nation’s involvement in World War II and I’d get the refrain, “we don’t talk much about it”. What I saw first hand in Japan made me realize how the Japanese bring it upon themselves to be bashed in history, regardless of their own dark doings or the opinions of others. Yet, part of the dilemma is cultural and still a greater part of it is their own way of looking very backward at their own history and upon themselves.